Archive for March, 2009

Stevens Point Journal: “Happy to see” unemployment not so bad!

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

No, the story below is not an Onion story, but from our own Stevens Pt. Journal…But first, my snarky preface.

“Who feels it knows it.”–Bob Marley

Conversely, who doesn’t feel it, doesn’t know it. Over here in the “un-insulated” invisible ghetto of lo-income AARPsters, we’ve grown accustomed to these stories, and take them with a grain of salt.

It may be that the members of the professional class on background and cited in this story from today’s Stevens Point Journal are simply so insulated from the prospect of ever facing unemployment, that they develop a sort of cognitive impairment.

This impairment only affects that part of the brain dealing with understanding, empathy and insight into the lives of lower castes of the citizenry who are dropping out of the spending class. Meanwhile, other parts of the brain dealing with numbers, economic models, and spinning data to look better, keep working unimpaired!

Who doesn’t feel it, doesn’t know it.

Let’s hope the stimulus works, so that the inconvenient truth about this economic system (it doesn’t serve most of us any longer) never becomes visible here. As for example, those unsightly tent cities growing up all over California.

Bobby G

Story below
—————————————-
Portage County, Stevens Point not immune to job reductions

http://www.stevenspointjournal.com/article/20090328/SPJ0101/903280668/1983
By Nick Paulson • Journal staff • March 28, 2009

A diverse industrial base is helping insulate Portage County from escalating unemployment.

“Due to our diversified employment base, we haven’t seen quite the impact that some areas have seen,” said Randy Cray, director of the Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. “We have the university, food processing, the insurance industry. So that does give us a variety.”

Unemployment numbers for February did increase in both Stevens Point and the county, according to the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development.

Portage County’s rose to 7.9 percent, from 7.1 percent in January. The city of Stevens Point jumped to 9.6 percent, up a full percent from last month.

But compared to other cities and counties statewide, the increases weren’t horrible, even compared to one year ago.

“One part I was happy to see … if you look at a lot of the other cities, where they were and where they are now, some growth is just staggering at how some cities have experienced just a huge balloon of unemployment,” said Stevens Point Mayor Andrew Halverson.

Stevens Point had the 14th highest total unemployment rate out of 31 cities tracked, while Portage County was the eighth lowest of 72 counties.

Another bright spot, Cray said, is that the county doesn’t rely heavily on construction and financial service employment, two industries that have been hit especially hard in the recession. Of the 37,400 total Portage County jobs in September 2008, only 5,000 were in those two industries, according to data from the CWERB.

But just because others are faring worse doesn’t mean there isn’t a downside, he cautioned.

“It clearly shows that we are not immune to what is going on at the national level,” Cray said. “Going from 5.2 to 7.9 (percent for Portage County) over the year is still a very large drop (in employment).”

New Ag Secretary’s New Attitude on small farms

Sunday, March 15th, 2009

Thanks to Trading Post Paul for calling our attention to this. Comments, as always, welcome. -bg

New Secretary of Agriculture Reveals New Attitude Towards Small Family Farm Sustainability, Civil Rights, and Rural Development with Address to the Federation of Southern Cooperatives
http://www.ssawg.org/Newsletters/SSAWGnewsMarch2009.html

The Federation of Southern Cooperatives/Land Assistance Fund hosted U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack on February 21, 2009, as he addressed more than 300 farmers and agriculture professionals at the Federation’s conference, held annually in Albany, Georgia. “When our first African-American president raised his hand and took the oath of office, wemade a huge step in this country. It’s now our job at the USDA to take the next step,” Vilsack stated. He said that if President Abraham Lincoln, who established the USDA in 1862, came back and wondered how the department is doing in supporting farmers, he would learn that “some folks refer to USDA as the last plantation, and it has a pretty poor history of taking care of people of color,” adding that he chose the conference as the place to make his first speech outside of Washington because he wants to send the message that they are serious about civil rights.

Vilsack took the opportunity to acknowledge the fact that the conference program began with sustainable agriculture topics, saying that it is a very important topic, and it’s going to be increasingly important. After acknowledging other topics that he considers key, such as food assistance programs that are included in President Obama’s stimulus package, he spoke
about the trends in agriculture that they see at the USDA.

“The first thing that popped out to me was the dramatic growth in the number of small farms–small income farms,” he said, referring to the recently released results from the Census of Agriculture. “In the last five years there have been 108,000 new farms started with sales of less than $1,000. These are very, very, very small operations. But that is a significant start for people in agriculture and a significant connection to the land–108,000.” He described the other end of the spectrum where the trend is the very large income farms that generate $500,000 or more, which grew by about 41,000 farms. The third trend, which he identified as the challenge, is that the farms in the middle, making more than $10,000 but less than $500,000, have decreased by 80,000. He pointed out two more trends: Sixty percent of all farms have less than $10,000 in sales, with 900,000 of 2,200,000 farmers having to work off-farm over 200 days per year to make it. The last trend that he brought into the picture is the fact that the average age of farmers has increased over the last five years from 55 to 57.

“Small farming increases; large farm increases; farms in the middle decreasing; aging farmers; farmers having to work off the farm,” he summarized. “So what does the USDA do about this? What should it be doing in the next four years?”

The Secretary said that the President has been very specific with him about renewing and replenishing rural areas across the country. Vilsack noted a number of things that need to be done to make that happen, including the development of strategies to make the small income farms into mid-income farms and become more profitable, as well as to maintain the existing mid-sized farms.

One of the ways he sees this happening is through a major push to focus on nutrition, including “fresh fruits and vegetables, nuts, things that are good for you. And it can start this year with the reauthorization of the school lunch and school breakfast programs.” Vilsack sees this as creating real opportunities to produce fresh vegetables and fruit and get them into schools and institutions locally. He also stressed that we need to develop regional distribution systems to encourage the growth.

In addition to strengthening the infrastructure for local and regional
mid-scale production, he talked about other rural development issues,
including new crops for biofuels, resources for bio-refineries, and
conservation stewardship.

Vilsack’s closing remarks focused on his commitment to seeing that the civil rights issues of the USDA will be addressed and  put in the past, andto making sure that all of the offices are “fair to black farmers, and fair to women farmers, and fair to Hispanic farmers, and fair to people from all walks of life who want to get into farming. We have 108,000 new farmers with less than $1,000 in sales. That’s a lot of people who want the opportunity to work the land and we want to give them that opportunity.”

North American drill-rig count in free-fall

Saturday, March 14th, 2009

Holy Cow:

Baker-Hughes weekly rotary rig count

According to my arithmetic, the number of oil and gas drilling rigs now working in US and Canada is down 41.5% from last year this time.

This is “correcting” the excess supply over demand caused by recession, they say. Okay, U.S. gasoline consumption is down about 5% from its peak in ‘08. Diesel down about 8%. So the 41.5% decline in drilling has not only “corrected” that demand destruction, it’s over-corrected it.

Fairly soon, you can be “bullish on oil” again.

bobby g

Global human protein deficit?

Saturday, March 14th, 2009

Sampled from Daily Kos, this commentary by Stranded Wind points to some difficulties ahead with our food chain.

Global Human Protein Deficit

Fri Mar 13, 2009 at 08:50:40 PM PDT

   A billionaire natural gas baron loses it all in a declining market. A New Jersey ammonia plant closes. A South Dakota farmer explains the correlation between the use of nitrogen fertilizer and wheat protein percentage.

Tens of thousands die in Haiti.

The first three have happened. The fourth has not yet come to pass but I’m hard pressed to envision a scenario where it doesn’t happen.

(This was published in October on the Stranded Wind Initiative web site, but it never made it here, which is a little strange. Bear with me as I clean up my backlog of unpublished diaries; this is still quite relevant.)

(Here’s a brand new WSJ article on related topics.)

     We have limited supplies of methane, commonly called natural gas. When found alone it is described, curiously, as being in a ‘pool’. Oil fields often have a natural gas cap which is left in place to pressurize them, then perhaps harvested once the oil production is deemed to be complete. Methane also forms in sanitary landfills, sewage lagoons, and today we’re starting to create biological processing systems to digest the waste from large scale livestock feeding operations to produce commercial volumes of the substance.

Due to its gaseous nature methane has to either be taken from a well connected to a pipeline network or simply abandoned; that which is left behind is referred to as stranded gas, and the Stranded Wind Initiative takes its name from this concept.

Aubrey McClendon, CEO of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, was forced to liquidate his holdings in the company last week.

“I am very disappointed to have been required to sell substantially all of my shares of Chesapeake. These involuntary and unexpected sales were precipitated by the extraordinary circumstances of the worldwide financial crisis. In no way do these sales reflect my view of the company’s financial position or my view of Chesapeake’s future performance potential. I have been the company’s largest individual shareholder for the past three years and frequently purchased additional shares of stock on margin as an expression of my complete confidence in the value of the company’s strategy and assets. My confidence in Chesapeake remains undiminished, and I look forward to rebuilding my ownership position in the company in the months and years ahead.”

He had 30,000,000 shares that were worth $70 not so long ago – the liquidation was a two billion dollar loss. OK, so he is still very wealthy and why do we care? We care because this is about how much money Chesapeake has. They’re going to dramatically scale back new wells.

Ammonia

Ammonia is a pungent, caustic gas at room temperature but it is easily pressurized and stored as a liquid. Ammonia itself, or various ammonia bearing compounds such as ammonium nitrate, ammonium carbonate, and urea are all used as fertilizer. Ammonia in its raw form also works tolerably well as a liquid fuel, performing rather like a low density diesel fuel.

Ammonia’s formula is NH3. Our current production methods involve stripping hydrogen from a hydrocarbon, usually natural gas, then later using the carbon monoxide produced in that reaction to strip further hydrogen from water. Nitrogen is separated from the air and the two are combined in a Haber Bosch reactor, producing a good bit of heat as the ammonia is formed.

Ammonia plants have been subjected to gas price fluctuation, cheaper production costs off shore, and now the financial crisis has nipped at least one plant, a New Jersey based operation, and I’m sure there is more news like that coming.

Crop Protein Content

Biologically available nitrogen is the foundation of all protein formation. Fully 50% of all human protein gets its start in a Haber Bosch reactor somewhere in the world. Now we’re losing both the input needed to make it and the ammonia plants themselves are suffering.

I knew corn required ammonia to make the astonishing yields we’ve seen in the last few decades; fields that would have produced fifty bushels an acre two generations ago currently produce four or five times that amount. I wasn’t aware of the tremendous difference that ammonia made in crop protein as well as overall yield, but Bryan Lutter, a farmer and seed distributor in South Dakota, recently brought me up to speed on it.

“Farmers can’t afford a thousand dollars a ton, so they’ve cut back on fertilizer. Wheat protein percentages will drop from 14% to 8%. People are going to starve.”

There were already significant concerns regarding wheat supplies and a dangerous pathogen called Ug99 wheat rust is spreading.

Assuming we dodge the wheat rust and climate issues the 43% reduction in protein content we won’t have much trouble here in North America but it is going to be awful for places like Haiti.

Haiti already had troubles related to food … and the things people do when there isn’t enough to go around. If the wheat they buy suddenly has dramatically less protein the effects will be awful.

Haiti is the obvious problem in this hemisphere and I’m going to pick Pakistan as the trouble spot in the east. They’re already under the gun financially and if they escape an outright default they’re still going to have reduction in imports … and again we come back to the 43% decrease in protein.

There are some things we can technically do to avoid outcomes along the lines of what I suggest above, but I don’t think we have the political will to do them.

Canada Farmers’ Union: Seed Modernization At What Cost?

Friday, March 13th, 2009

Excerpt from a recent presentation made by farmer Maureen Bostock, a National Farmer’s Union member from Ontario. A version of this presentation appeared in the Union Farmer (Spring 2009).

Seed Modernization At What Cost?

[The system (see *below)] which has served growers very well is to be dismantled in the government’s determination to replace protecting farmers with protecting corporate profits.

CFIA’s decision to make these changes to the Varietal Registration Framework is not a stand-alone policy; it is part of an economic strategy which has changed the world food order over the past few decades. It began with consolidation of the retail sector, vertically integrating the food chain from transportation, processing and retailing. Pesticide corporations followed suit and began to look for ways to control the agricultural production chain. They focused their attention on seeds when they realized that proprietary control of seeds and genetics could increase their profits. By attaching identity preservation, the value of seeds could be greatly increased. GE Terminator Technology has been developed to prevent unauthorized use of IP seeds. Seed and pesticide corporations began to lobby for governments to get out of seed production.

The Canadian government meanwhile has been pursuing its own agenda of privatization: the three D’s – downsizing, downloading and deregulation with the intention to free up the marketplace perfectly dovetails with industry’s goal to stop public breeding programs from competing with private industry.

The road to greater corporate profits requires both these fundamental changes –the elimination of competition from public breeding programs as well as the introduction of production contracts to secure profits.

For farmers, a future when contractual potato production becomes the norm, means both increased seed costs and the loss of the right to save potato seed year to year to replant.

Can farmers make a living if the cost of seed skyrockets? Let’s take a quick look at Canadian statistics:

While gross farm receipts have grown from $15,000 in 1926 to $150,000 in 2006, net incomes have dropped to $20,000 in the red. The cause of this disaster is the profits multinational corporations have given themselves permission to take in exchange for machinery, seed, feed, fuel, fertilizers, energy costs and bank interest. The combined profits of Agrium, Mosaic, Terra, Potash Corp and CF Industries rose from $100 million in 2002 to $1.2 billion in 2007. Potato prices have risen all of $18.05 per tonne since 1999. This is Canadian agriculture, where farmers lose money and corporations get richer.

There are other consequences to farmers if potatoes leave the arena of “public goods”. As potato seed increasingly becomes the property of corporations, the genetic diversity of potatoes may be threatened. With profit being the driving force rather than public interest, there is the potential for unconscionable disposal of genetic resources, such as the example of the corporation which sent to the landfill all but the most profitable seed in its warehouse upon the takeover of an international seed house.

Plant breeding was described by W.T. Bradnock, the director of Seeds Division of Ag Canada in the 1980s as resembling “the creation of a mosaic with contributions from different sources needed to complete the design.” Modern breeding programs tend to seek a single gene to provide resistance to disease. These products of vertical breeding have been found to convey short term resistance when compared to horizontal breeding programs, such as the work of the Loo family of PEI who selected Island Sunshine from varietal crosses which survived exposure to Late Blight. As we move closer to the day when IP potato varieties dominate the registry, we sacrifice the possibility of a broader genetic diversity.

To sum up then, it is suspect that a 30,000 ha seed crop such as potatoes is being accorded no more protection than the 10 ha of sunflowers. The loss of merit assessment combined with easing of deregistration will result in high-cost IP potatoes replacing older, proven varieties. Corporations achieve the cessation of public breeding programs competing with private while the federal government furthers its privatization initiative by moving closer to getting out of crop research and development altogether. When we ask who will benefit from the loss of pre-registration testing and merit assessment, it is all too clear that it will not be farmers.

* Canada’s public seed support consists of . . .19 experimental stations in Canada, one of which is the Potato Research Centre, employing 19 scientists and a total staff of 97. The Potato Research Centre has 18 potato releases in production across Canada and internationally, with the first commercial potato variety released in 1950. The Potato Research Centre conducts field trials on new potato varieties, collaborates with the International Potato Centre in Peru and other national breeding programs, conducts potato production studies in co-operation with provincial depts., universities & industry; and produces studies on erosion control, soil & water quality and land use on potato farms; as well as operates the Potato Gene Bank. As well, every January the Potato Research Centre offers 5 to 10 new varieties to growers of all size operations for the opportunity to do their own evaluations. (bolding mine-b).

Guest commentary by Thomas Friedman: The “Great Disruption” has begun

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

Usual talk these days is comparing our times to the “Great Depression.” It’s not as bad. It’s almost as bad. It’s worse. This is different, it’s a “Great Recession”. No, it’s different, it’s a “Greater Depression.” Stuff like that.

I like what Friedman says here, so I’m reprinting it: “Great Disruption.” Amen.

Bobby G.

 

 

Published: March 7, 2009

Sometimes the satirical newspaper The Onion is so right on, I can’t resist quoting from it. Consider this faux article from June 2005 about America’s addiction to Chinese exports:

 

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Thomas L. Friedman

FENGHUA, China — Chen Hsien, an employee of Fenghua Ningbo Plastic Works Ltd., a plastics factory that manufactures lightweight household items for Western markets, expressed his disbelief Monday over the “sheer amount of shit Americans will buy. Often, when we’re assigned a new order for, say, ‘salad shooters,’ I will say to myself, ‘There’s no way that anyone will ever buy these.’ … One month later, we will receive an order for the same product, but three times the quantity. How can anyone have a need for such useless shit? I hear that Americans can buy anything they want, and I believe it, judging from the things I’ve made for them,” Chen said. “And I also hear that, when they no longer want an item, they simply throw it away. So wasteful and contemptible.”

Let’s today step out of the normal boundaries of analysis of our economic crisis and ask a radical question: What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it’s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall — when Mother Nature and the market both said: “No more.”

We have created a system for growth that depended on our building more and more stores to sell more and more stuff made in more and more factories in China, powered by more and more coal that would cause more and more climate change but earn China more and more dollars to buy more and more U.S. T-bills so America would have more and more money to build more and more stores and sell more and more stuff that would employ more and more Chinese …

We can’t do this anymore.

“We created a way of raising standards of living that we can’t possibly pass on to our children,” said Joe Romm, a physicist and climate expert who writes the indispensable blog climateprogress.org. We have been getting rich by depleting all our natural stocks — water, hydrocarbons, forests, rivers, fish and arable land — and not by generating renewable flows.

“You can get this burst of wealth that we have created from this rapacious behavior,” added Romm. “But it has to collapse, unless adults stand up and say, ‘This is a Ponzi scheme. We have not generated real wealth, and we are destroying a livable climate …’ Real wealth is something you can pass on in a way that others can enjoy.”

Over a billion people today suffer from water scarcity; deforestation in the tropics destroys an area the size of Greece every year — more than 25 million acres; more than half of the world’s fisheries are over-fished or fished at their limit.

“Just as a few lonely economists warned us we were living beyond our financial means and overdrawing our financial assets, scientists are warning us that we’re living beyond our ecological means and overdrawing our natural assets,” argues Glenn Prickett, senior vice president at Conservation International. But, he cautioned, as environmentalists have pointed out: “Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”

One of those who has been warning me of this for a long time is Paul Gilding, the Australian environmental business expert. He has a name for this moment — when both Mother Nature and Father Greed have hit the wall at once — “The Great Disruption.”

“We are taking a system operating past its capacity and driving it faster and harder,” he wrote me. “No matter how wonderful the system is, the laws of physics and biology still apply.” We must have growth, but we must grow in a different way. For starters, economies need to transition to the concept of net-zero, whereby buildings, cars, factories and homes are designed not only to generate as much energy as they use but to be infinitely recyclable in as many parts as possible. Let’s grow by creating flows rather than plundering more stocks.

Gilding says he’s actually an optimist. So am I. People are already using this economic slowdown to retool and reorient economies. Germany, Britain, China and the U.S. have all used stimulus bills to make huge new investments in clean power. South Korea’s new national paradigm for development is called: “Low carbon, green growth.” Who knew? People are realizing we need more than incremental changes — and we’re seeing the first stirrings of growth in smarter, more efficient, more responsible ways.

In the meantime, says Gilding, take notes: “When we look back, 2008 will be a momentous year in human history. Our children and grandchildren will ask us, ‘What was it like? What were you doing when it started to fall apart? What did you think? What did you do?’ Often in the middle of something momentous, we can’t see its significance. But for me there is no doubt: 2008 will be the marker — the year when ‘The Great Disruption’ began.”

2009: The Year that Industrial Agriculture Collapsed

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

By Bobby G. 5 March 2013 first posted in Akashic Records 5 March 2009

Speaking now from our hindsight vantage-point in 2013, before I lay out several recent articles, all somewhat long, detailing the crisis in agriculture which loomed in that year, 2009, I’ll say this. Finally, we begin to see the rapid-fire timeline that led us to the much -prophesized “end date” common to the Mayan Long Count Calendar, some predictive prophecy from the Vedic people’s tradition, as well as the “Timewave Zero” which Terence and Dennis McKenna supposedly discovered independently using the I Ching. Separately, Vinge, Kurzweil et al. had predicted a sort of orgy of technological radical human evolution they liked to call the “Technological Singularity” — also oddly enough pegged to the Maya Calendar date of 12/21/2012.

This 2012 thing really captured a lot of people’s attention. And well it should. I tended to conflate James Howard Kunstler’s snarky commentary together with the 2012 hoopla, while poking fun at the “technological singularity” I took to calling the pivotal date 12/21/2012 the “Clusterf**k Singularity.” Here’s how it plays out in the next 45 months:

2008 was the year the global banking system collapsed.

2009 was the year in which Totalitarian Agriculture finally collapsed, revealing its utter inability to feed the enormous global population, and the complete unsustainability that is essential to its existence as a system of human invention. (Articles below)

2010 was the year in which the fossil fuel energy system collapsed, strangely enough combining the peak of global oil production (”peak oil”) together with Richard Duncan’s “Olduvai Cliff.” Let’s just say that bad things really happened that year. It’s not one any of us want to revisit.

2011 brought on, early in the year, the complete collapse of the EurAmericAsian “military-industrial complex.” Warfare as a solution to unsustainability completely collapsed and unraveled. It ran out of funding, food, and energy. The entity known as the “nation-state” began its long sunset and disappearance as a plague from human history. It turned out, you could not kill every last “Islamic extremist” and “Jihadist” and in fact, those folks are now saddled with tremendous administrative burdens in those autonomous zones where they have the bad luck to be in charge. I wish them luck.

Which brings us to what happened in 2012. Industrial civilization devolved in an astonishing blink of an eye, historically speaking. We now, from our unfortunate vantage point in 2013, are faced with a world that is astonishingly ugly, ruined, completely dysfunctional, yet somehow we find hope in the task of rebuilding all this demolished shit from the ground up. I only hope we can preserve most of the extant species now remaining…

For now, let’s return to 2009, the year in which Totalitarian Agriculture met its demise.

First up, Bob Waldrop from Oklahoma Food Co-op dismissed James Howard Kunstler’s comments about the cause of the ag. crisis, which follows at the end of this interminable blog entry of mine.

Posted by: “Robert Waldrop”

Tue Mar 3, 2009 9:29 pm (PST)

I think Kunstler has it wrong about the impact of
our present financial crisis on farm country at
least for this year.

I am not hearing of any problems around here
regarding financing “at the farm level”. A lot of
credit provided for planting loans in the
conventional ag bidness comes from government
programs or is guaranteed by government programs
and that pipeline is still open. Crop insurance
also appears to still available. Conventional ag
hasn’t experienced a “credit bubble” over the last
decade the way the rest of the economy has. Ag
has already been there, done that, and gone
through several “collapses” over the last 30
years, so rural lenders to farmers have trended
towards “more conservative” than the pump and dump
$800,000 house in an exurb bidness.

The problems I am hearing about are mostly weather
related (Oklahoma has had a very dry winter, and
the winter wheat crop is suffering, indeed, we
need rain “soon” to have much of a crop this year
at all, see also “California Central Valley
Drought), in the CAFO system (high prices for
inputs), and at the “giant transnational
aggregator” level (e.g. financing for
international ag trade, the big transational
corporations like Archer Daniels Midland, etc). I
continue to hear a lot of anecdotes about CAFOs
(confined animal feeding operations) shutting down
suddenly.

Weather permitting, I think crops will be planted
and harvested this year. There sure could be
problems though in the supply chain relative to
the economic crisis. We could have a situation
where there is a lot of food at the rural
“gathering” spots like grain elevators and potato
warehouses, but bottlenecks getting it from there
to cities. In that situation, everyone from FEMA
to the National Guard might be mobilized to
transport field run foods into the cities, but
grain and soybeans while nourishing would be a
challenge for many urban families. Get your
printable flyer on how to improvise a grain
grinder and prepare soybeans while the internet is
still up!
http://www.energyco nservationinfo. org/printflyers. htm .

Speaking of drought, I have been planting peas and
potatoes and I should have been watering my mulch
this winter because not a lot of decomposition has
occurred at the ground level. So I bought an
organic fertilizer made here in Oklahoma, to go
with my Azomite (mineral dust, also a new tactic
this year) and the winter’s ashes from our wood
burning stove.

To return to farm credit, all bets are off for
next year. This year’s money is already in the
farm credit pipeline. We will see if the system
is able to do the same next year.

Bob Waldrop, OKC

Below is an update about the southern plains winter wheat crop, from today’s Oklahoma Farm Report. The news isn’t good. The issue this year is weather, not finance.

Bob Waldrop, OKC
http://oklahomafarmreport.com/wire/news/00593_Allendale_Wheat2009_213211.php
Another Verse of ‘How Dry We Are’ Being Sung- This Time by Joe Victor of Allendale~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Allendale Inc is well aware of the fact two of the top four US winter wheat producing state’s crop condition ratings are far less than desirable. Both Texas and Oklahoma are facing very dry conditions, with little chance of rain hitting wheat fields in either state in the immediate future.

Weather conditions and forecast are less than optimistic for the Southern Plains as two week forecasted temps suggest swings of more than 25 degrees which may promote heaving while the present drought monitor suggest more than periodic rains will be required to dig out of harsh conditions. Principle key winter wheat producing states of Kansas, Oklahoma, Washington and Texas have a degree of abnormally dry to severe drought.

Joe Victor with Allendale has assembled a one pager on the ramifications for the wheat market fundamentals- and we have the pdf file linked on our website. Clickon the link below to take a look at this work.
http://oklahomafarmreport.com/wire/news/media/00006_Wheat_Conditions_p030309.pdf

Catastrophic Fall in 2009 Global Food Production*****

By Eric deCarbonnel

 

After reading about the droughts in two major agricultural countries, China and Argentina, I decided to research the extent other food producing nations were also experiencing droughts. This project ended up taking a lot longer than I thought. 2009 looks to be a humanitarian disaster around much of the world

To understand the depth of the food Catastrophe that faces the world this year, consider the graphic below depicting countries by USD value of their agricultural output, as of 2006.

Now, consider the same graphic with the countries experiencing droughts highlighted.

The countries that make up two thirds of the world’s agricultural output are experiencing drought conditions. Whether you watch a video of the drought in China, Australia, Africa, South America, or the US, the scene will be the same: misery, ruined crop, and dying cattle.

China

The drought in Northern China, the worst in 50 years, is worsening, and summer harvest is now threatened. The area of affected crops has expanded to 161 million mu (was 141 million last week), and 4.37 million people and 2.1 million livestock are facing drinking water shortage. The scarcity of rain in some parts of the north and central provinces is the worst in recorded history.

The drought which started in November threatens over half the wheat crop in eight provinces – Hebei, Shanxi, Anhui, Jiangsu, Henan, Shandong, Shaanxi and Gansu.

Henan
China’s largest crop producing province, Henan, has issued the highest-level drought warning. Henan has received an average rainfall of 10.5 millimeters since November 2008, almost 80 percent less than in the same period in the previous years. The Henan drought, which began in November, is the most severe since 1951.

Anhui
Anhui Province issued a red drought alert, with more than 60 percent of the crops north of the Huaihe River plagued by a major drought.

Shanxi
Shanxi Province was put on orange drought alert on Jan. 21, with one million people and 160,000 heads of livestock are facing water shortage.

Jiangsu
Jiangsu province has already lost over one fifth of the wheat crops affected by drought. Local agricultural departments are diverting water from nearby rivers in an emergency effort to save the rest.

Hebei
Over 100 million cubic meters of water has been channeled in from outside the province to fight Hebei’s drought.

Shaanxi
1.34 million acres of crops across the bone-dry Shanxi province are affected by the worsening drought.

Shandong
Since last November, Shandong province has experienced 73 percent less rain than the same period in previous years, with little rainfall forecast for the future.

Relief efforts are under way. The Chinese government has allocated 86.7 billion yuan (about $12.69 billion) to drought-hit areas. Authorities have also resorted to cloud-seeding, and some areas received a sprinkling of rain after clouds were hit with 2,392 rockets and 409 cannon shells loaded with chemicals. However, there is a limit to what can be done in the face of such widespread water shortage.

As I have previously written, China is facing hyperinflation, and this record drought will make things worse. China produces 18% of the world’s grain each year.

Australia

Australia has been experiencing an unrelenting drought since 2004, and 41 percent of Australia’s agriculture continues to suffer from the worst drought in 117 years of record-keeping. The drought has been so severe that rivers stopped flowing, lakes turned toxic, and farmers abandoned their land in frustration:

A) The Murray River stopped flowing at its terminal point, and its mouth has closed up.
B) Australia’s lower lakes are evaporating, and they are now a meter (3.2 feet) below sea level. If these lakes evaporate any further, the soil and the mud system below the water is going to be exposed to the air. The mud will then acidify, releasing sulfuric acid and a whole range of heavy metals. After this occurs, those lower lake systems will essentially become a toxic swamp which will never be able to be recovered. The Australian government’s only options to prevent this are to allow salt water in, creating a dead sea, or to pray for rain.

For some reason, the debate over climate change is essentially over in Australia.

The United States

California
California is facing its worst drought in recorded history. The drought is predicted to be the most severe in modern times, worse than those in 1977 and 1991. Thousands of acres of row crops already have been fallowed, with more to follow. The snowpack in the Northern Sierra, home to some of the state’s most important reservoirs, proved to be just 49 percent of average. Water agencies throughout the state are scrambling to adopt conservation mandates.

Texas
The Texan drought is reaching historic proportion. Dry conditions near Austin and San Antonio have been exceeded only once before—the drought of 1917-18. 88 percent of Texas is experiencing abnormally dry conditions, and 18 percent of the state is in either extreme or exceptional drought conditions. The drought areas have been expanding almost every month. Conditions in Texas are so bad cattle are keeling over in parched pastures and dying. Lack of rainfall has left pastures barren, and cattle producers have resorted to feeding animals hay. Irreversible damage has been done to winter wheat crops in Texas. Both short and long-term forecasts don’t call for much rain at all, which means the Texas drought is set to get worse.

Augusta Region (Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina)
The Augusta region has been suffering from a worsening two year drought. Augusta’s rainfall deficit is already approaching 2 inches so far in 2009, with January being the driest since 1989.

Florida
Florida has been hard hit by winter drought, damaging crops, and half of state is in some level of a drought.

La Niña likely to make matters worse
Enough water a couple of degrees cooler than normal has accumulated in the eastern part of the Pacific to create a La Niña, a weather pattern expected to linger until at least the spring. La Niña generally means dry weather for Southern states, which is exactly what the US doesn’t need right now.


South America

Argentina
The worst drought in half a century has turned Argentina’s once-fertile soil to dust and pushed the country into a state of emergency. Cow carcasses litter the prairie fields, and sun-scorched soy plants wither under the South American summer sun. Argentina’s food production is set to go down a minimum of 50 percent, maybe more. The country’s wheat yield for 2009 will be 8.7 million metric tons, down from 16.3 million in 2008. Concern with domestic shortages (domestic wheat consumption being approximately 6.7 million metric ton), Argentina has granted no new export applications since mid January.

Brazil
Brazil has cut its outlook for the crops and will do so again after assessing damage to plants from desiccation in drought-stricken regions. Brazil is the world’s second-biggest exporter of soybeans and third-largest for corn.

Brazil’s numbers for corn harvesting:

Harvested in 2008: 58.7 million tons
January 8 forecast: 52.3 million tons
February 6 forecast: 50.3 metric tons (optimistic)
Harvested in 2009: ???

Paraguay
Severe drought affecting Paraguay’s economy has pushed the government to declare agricultural emergency. Crops that have direct impact on cattle food are ruined, and the soy plantations have been almost totally lost in some areas.

Uruguay
Uruguay declared an “agriculture emergency” last month, due to the worst drought in decades which is threatening crops, livestock and the provision of fresh produce.
The a worsening drought is pushing up food and beverage costs causing Uruguay’s consumer prices to rise at the fastest annual pace in more than four years in January.

Bolivia
There hasn’t been a drop of rain in Bolivia in nearly a year. Cattle dying, crops ruined, etc…

Chile
The severe drought affecting Chile has caused an agricultural emergency in 50 rural districts, and large sectors of the economy are concerned about possible electricity rationing in March. The countries woes stem from the “La Niña” climate phenomenon which has over half of Chile dangling by a thread: persistently cold water in the Pacific ocean along with high atmospheric pressure are preventing rain-bearing fronts from entering central and southern areas of the country. As a result, the water levels at hydroelectric dams and other reservoirs are at all-time lows.

Horn of Africa

Africa faces food shortages and famine. Food production across the Horn of Africa has suffered because of the lack of rainfall. Also, half the agricultural soil has lost nutrients necessary to grow plant, and the declining soil fertility across Africa is exacerbating drought related crop losses.

Kenya
Kenya is the worst hit nation in the region, having been without rainfall for 18 months. Kenya needs to import food to bridge a shortfall and keep 10 million of its people from starvation. Kenya’s drought suffering neighbors will be of little help.

Tanzania
A poor harvest due to drought has prompted Tanzania to stop issuing food export permits. Tanzania has also intensified security at the border posts to monitor and prevent the export of food. There are 240,000 people in need of immediate relief food in Tanzania.

Burundi
Crops in the north of Burundi have withered, leaving the tiny East African country facing a severe food shortage

Uganda
Severe drought in northeastern Uganda’s Karamoja region has the left the country on the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe. The dry conditions and acute food shortages, which have left Karamoja near starvation, are unlikely to improve before October when the next harvest is due.

South Africa
South Africa faces a potential crop shortage after wheat farmers in the eastern part of the Free State grain belt said they were likely to produce their lowest crop in 30 years this year. South Africans are “extremely angry” that food prices continue to rise.

Other African nations suffering from drought in 2009 are: Malawi, Zambia, Swaziland, Somalia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Tunisia, Angola, and Ethiopia.

Middle East and Central Asia

The Middle East and Central Asia are suffering from the worst droughts in recent history, and food grain production has dropped to some of the lowest levels in decades. Total wheat production in the wider drought-affected region is currently estimated to have declined by at least 22 percent in 2009. Owing to the drought’s severity and region-wide scope, irrigation supplies from reservoirs, rivers, and groundwater have been critically reduced. Major reservoirs in Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria are all at low levels requiring restrictions on usage. Given the severity of crop losses in the region, a major shortage of planting seed for the 2010 crop is expected.

Iraq
In Iraq during the winter grain growing period, there was essentially no measurable rainfall in many regions, and large swaths of rain-fed fields across northern Iraq simply went unplanted. These primarily rain-fed regions in northern Iraq are described as an agricultural disaster area this year, with wheat production falling 80-98 percent from normal levels. The USDA estimates total wheat production in Iraq in 2009 at 1.3 million tons, down 45 percent from last year.

Syria
Syria is experienced its worst drought in the past 18 years, and the USDA estimates total wheat production in Syria in 2009 at 2.0 million tons, down 50 percent from last year. Last summer, the taps ran dry in many neighborhoods of Damascus and residents of the capital city were forced to buy water on the black market. The severe lack of rain this winter has exacerbated the problem.

Afghanistan
Lack of rainfall has led Afghanistan to the worst drought conditions in the past 10 years. The USDA estimates 2008/09 wheat production in Afghanistan at 1.5 million tons, down 2.3 million or 60 percent from last year. Afghanistan normally produces 3.5-4.0 million tons of wheat annually.

Jordan
Jordan’s persistent drought has grown worse, with almost no rain falling on the kingdom this year. The Jordanian government has stopped pumping water to farms to preserve the water for drinking purposes.

Other Middle Eastern and Central Asian nations suffering from drought in 2009 are: The Palestinian Territories, Lebanon, Israel, Bangladesh, Myanmar, India, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Thailand, Nepal, Pakistan, Turkey, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Cyprus, and Iran.

Lack of credit will worsen food shortage

A lack of credit for farmers curbed their ability to buy seeds and fertilizers in 2008/2009 and will limit production around the world. The effects of droughts worldwide will also be amplified by the smaller amount of seeds and fertilizers used to grow crops.

Low commodity prices will worsen food shortage

The low prices at the end of 2008 discouraged the planting of new crops in 2009. In Kansas for example, farmers seeded nine million acres, the smallest planting for half a century. Wheat plantings this year are down about 4 million acres across the US and about 1.1 million acres in Canada. So even discounting drought related losses, the US, Canada, and other food producing nations are facing lower agricultural output in 2009.

Europe will not make up for the food shortfall

Europe, the only big agricultural region relatively unaffected by drought, is set for a big drop in food production. Due to the combination of a late plantings, poorer soil conditions, reduced inputs, and light rainfall, Europe’s agricultural output is likely to fall by 10 to 15 percent.

Stocks of foodstuff are dangerously low

Low stocks of foodstuff make the world’s falling agriculture output particularly worrisome. The combined averaged of the ending stock levels of the major trading countries of Australia, Canada, United States, and the European Union have been declining steadily in the last few years:

2002-2005: 47.4 million tons
2007: 37.6 million tons
2008: 27.4 million tons

These inventory numbers are dangerously low, especially considering the horrifying possibility that China’s 60 million tons of grain reserves doesn’t actually exists.

Global food Catastrophe

The world is heading for a drop in agricultural production of 20 to 40 percent, depending on the severity and length of the current global droughts. Food producing nations are imposing food export restrictions. Food prices will soar, and, in poor countries with food deficits, millions will starve.

The deflation debate should end now

The droughts plaguing the world’s biggest agricultural regions should end the debate about deflation in 2009. The demand for agricultural commodities is relatively immune to developments in the business cycles (at least compared to that of energy or base metals), and, with a 20 to 40 percent decline in world production, already rising food prices are headed significantly higher.

In fact, agricultural commodities NEED to head higher and soon, to prevent even greater food shortages and famine. The price of wheat, corn, soybeans, etc must rise to a level which encourages the planting of every available acre with the best possible fertilizers. Otherwise, if food prices stay at their current levels, production will continue to fall, sentencing millions more to starvation.

Competitive currency appreciation

Some observers are anticipating “competitive currency devaluations” in addition to deflation for 2009 (nations devalue their currencies to help their export sector). The coming global food shortage makes this highly unlikely. Depreciating their currency in the current environment will produce the unwanted consequence of boosting exports—of food. Even with export restrictions like those in China, currency depreciation would cause the outflow of significant quantities of grain via the black market.

Instead of “competitive currency devaluations”, spiking food prices will likely cause competitive currency appreciation in 2009. Foreign exchange reserves exist for just this type of emergency. Central banks around the world will lower domestic food prices by either directly selling off their reserves to appreciate their currencies or by using them to purchase grain on the world market.

Appreciating a currency is the fastest way to control food inflation. A more valuable currency allows a nation to monopolize more global resources (ie: the overvalued dollar allows the US to consume 25% of the world’s oil despite having only 4% of the world’s population). If China were to selloff its US reserves, its enormous population would start sucking up the world’s food supply like the US has been doing with oil.

On the flip side, when a nation appreciates its currency and starts consuming more of the world’s resources, it leaves less for everyone else. So when china appreciates the yuan, food shortages worldwide will increase and prices everywhere else will jump upwards. As there is nothing that breeds social unrest like soaring food prices, nations around the world, from Russia, to the EU, to Saudi Arabia, to India, will sell off their foreign reserves to appreciate their currencies and reduce the cost of food imports. In response to this, China will sell even more of its reserves and so on. That is competitive currency appreciation.

When faced with competitive currency appreciation, you do NOT want to be the world’s reserve currency. The dollar is likely to do very poorly as central banks liquidate trillions in US holdings to buy food and appreciate their currencies

What Next?

 

James Howard Kunstler, Clusterfunk Nation, 2 March 2009.

Isn’t that a question, though….
The Peak Oil story was never about running out of oil. It was about the collapse of complex systems in a world economy faced by the prospect of no further oil-fueled growth. It was something of a shock to many that the first complex system to fail would be banking, but the process is obvious: no more growth means no more ability to pay interest on credit… end of story, as Tony Soprano used to say.
There was a popular theory among Peak Oilers the last decade that the world would enter a “bumpy plateau” period when the global economy would get beaten down by peak oil, would then revive as “demand destruction” drove down oil prices, and would be beaten down again as oil prices shot up in response — with serial repetitions of the cycle, each beat-down taking economies lower — the only imaginable outcome being some sort of quiet homeostasis. This scenario did not play out as expected. It was predicated on a mistaken assumption that all systems would retain some kind of operational resilience while ratcheting down. Anyway, the banking system was mortally wounded in the first go-round and the behemoth is dying hard.
The last desperate act of the banking system in the face of Peak Oil’s no-more-growth equation was to engineer species of tradable securities that could produce wealth out of thin air rather than productive activity. This was the alphabet soup of algorithm-derived frauds with vague and confounding names such as credit default swaps (CDSs), collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), structured investment vehicles (SIVs), and, of course, the basic filler, mortgage backed securities. The banking system is now choking to death on these delicacies.
The trouble is that the EMT squad brought in to rescue the banking system — that is, governments — can’t remove these obstructions from the patient’s craw. They don’t want to drown in a mighty upchuck of the alphabet soup.
The collapse of complex systems is actually predicated on the idea that the systems would mutually reinforce each other’s failures. This is now plain to see as the collapse of banking (that is, of both lending and debt service), has led to the collapse of commerce and manufacturing. The next systems to go will probably be farming, transportation, and the oil markets themselves (which constitute the system for allocating and distributing world energy resources). As these things seize up, the final system to go will be governance, at least at the highest levels.
If we’re really lucky, human affairs will eventually reorganize at a lower scale of activity, governance, civility, and economy. Every week, the failure to recognize the nature of our predicament thrusts us further into the uncharted territory of hardship. The task of government right now is not to prop up doomed systems at their current scales of failure, but to prepare the public to rebuild our systems at smaller scales.
The net effect of the failures in banking is that a lot of people have less money than they expected they would have a year ago. This is bad enough, given our habits and practices of modern life. But what happens when farming collapses? The prospect for that is closer than most of us might realize. The way we produce our food has been organized at a scale that has ruinous consequences, not least its addiction to capital. Now that banking is in collapse, capital will be extremely scarce. Nobody in the cities reads farm news, or listens to farm reports on the radio. Guess what, though: we are entering the planting season. It will be interesting to learn how many farmers “out there” in the Cheez Doodle belt are not able to secure loans for this year’s crop.
My guess is that the disorder in agriculture will be pretty severe this year, especially since some of the world’s most productive places — California, northern China, Argentina, the Australian grain belt — are caught in extremes of drought on top of capital shortages. If the US government is going to try to make remedial policy for anything, it better start with agriculture, to promote local, smaller-scaled farming using methods that are much less dependent on oil byproducts and capital injections.
This will, of course, require a re-allocation of lands suitable for growing food. Our real estate market mechanisms could conceivably enable this to happen, but not without a coherent consensus that it is imperative to do so. If agri-business as currently practiced doesn’t founder on capital shortages, it will surely collapse on disruptions in the oil markets. President Obama at least made a start in the right direction by proposing to eliminate further subsidies to farmers above the $250,000 level. But the situation is really more acute. Surely the US Department of Agriculture already knows about it, but the public may not be interested until the shelves in the Piggly-Wiggly are bare — and then, of course, they’ll go apeshit.
The recent huge drop in oil prices has left the public once again convinced that the world is drowning in oil — if only the scoundrelly oil companies were forced to deliver it at reasonable prices. The public has been consistently deluded about this for decades. What’s missing so far is for the president of the US to lay out the reality of the situation in a dedicated TV address. I know a lot of you think that Jimmy Carter already tried this and failed to make an impression (and ruined his presidency in the process). I guarantee you that Mr. Obama will have to do this sometime in the next few years whether he likes or not, and he’d be well-advised to get it done sooner rather than later. And by this I don’t mean just vague allusions to “energy independence” or “renewables” in speeches devoted to many other issues. I mean telling the public the plain truth that we’ll never offset oil depletion and the intelligent response is to do everything possible to transition to walkable towns and public transit, not to sustain the unsustainable.
The alternatives — i.e. what we’re trying now — is to further delude ourselves into thinking that we can run WalMart and the suburbs by some other means than oil. Despite all our investments in these things, we won’t be able to run them by other means, and the news about this had better get out before enormous disappointment turns into titanic rage. If Americans think they’ve been grifted by Goldman Sachs and Bernie Madoff, wait until they find out what a swindle the so-called “American Dream” of suburban life turns out to be.
On this blizzardy Monday in the power centers of America, attention is fixed on the never-ending fiasco of AIG — a company whose main product turned out to be credit default swaps, and is now choking on them. Kibitzers on the sidelines of finance are forecasting a king-hell bear market suckers’ rally in the stock markets followed by a belly flop to Dow 4000 or lower. I myself called for Dow 4000 two years ago — and was obviously a bit off on my timing. All this is surely trouble enough. But while your attention is focused on Rick Santelli in the Chicago trader’s pit, or Larry Kudlow desperately seeking “mustard seeds” of new growth in financials, try to let one eye stray to the horizon where these other complex systems are working out their next moves. Farming. The oil markets. These are the coming theaters of alarm and distress.